MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965328872 · doi:10.1080/10715760310001604125

γ-Tocopherol biokinetics and transformation in humans

2003· article· en· W1965328872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFree Radical Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTocopherolTransformation (genetics)ChemistryVitamin EBiochemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The uptake and biotransformation of gamma-tocopherol (gamma-T) in humans is largely unknown. Using a stable isotope method we investigated these aspects of gamma-T biology in healthy volunteers and their response to gamma-T supplementation. METHODS: A single bolus of 100 mg of deuterium labeled gamma-T acetate (d(2)-gamma-TAC, 94% isotopic purity) was administered with a standard meal to 21 healthy subjects. Blood and urine (first morning void) were collected at baseline and a range of time points between 6 and 240 h post-supplemetation. The concentrations of d(2) and d(0)-gamma-T in plasma and its major metabolite 2,7,8-trimethyl-2-(b-carboxyethyl)-6-hydroxychroman (-gamma-CEHC) in plasma and urine were measured by GC-MS. In two subjects, the total urine volume was collected for 72 h post-supplementation. The effects of gamma-T supplementation on alpha-T concentrations in plasma and alpha-T and gamma-T metabolite formation were also assessed by HPLC or GC-MS analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, mean plasma alpha-T concentration was approximately 15 times higher than gamma-T (28.3 vs. 1.9 micromol/l). In contrast, plasma gamma-CEHC concentration (0.191 micromol/l) was 12 fold greater than alpha-CEHC (0.016 micromol/l) while in urine it was 3.5 fold lower (0.82 and 2.87 micromol, respectively) suggesting that the clearance of alpha-CEHC from plasma was more than 40 times that of gamma-CEHC. After d(2)-gamma-TAC administration, the d(2) forms of gamma-T and gamma-CEHC in plasma and urine increased, but with marked inter-individual variability, while the d(0) species were hardly affected. Mean total concentrations of gamma-T and gamma-CEHC in plasma and urine peaked, respectively, between 0-9, 6-12 and 9-24 h post-supplementation with increases over baseline levels of 6-14 fold. All these parameters returned to baseline by 72 h. Following challenge, the total urinary excretion of d(2)-gamma-T equivalents was approximately 7 mg. Baseline levels of gamma-T correlated positively with the post-supplementation rise of (d(0) + d(2)) - gamma - T and gamma-CEHC levels in plasma, but correlated negatively with urinary levels of (d(0) + d(2))-gamma-CEHC. Supplementation with 100 mg gamma-TAC had minimal influence on plasma concentrations of alpha-T and alpha-T-related metabolite formation and excretion. CONCLUSIONS: Ingestion of 100mg of gamma-TAC transiently increases plasma concentrations of gamma-T as it undergoes sustained catabolism to CEHC without markedly influencing the pre-existing plasma pool of gamma-T nor the concentration and metabolism of alpha-T. These pathways appear tightly regulated, most probably to keep high steady-state blood ratios alpha-T to gamma-T and gamma-CEHC to alpha-CEHC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it