Th1/Th2 xenogenic antibody responses are associated with recipient dendritic cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We characterized dendritic cells (DC) phenotypically and functionally between C57BL/6 (Th1-prone) and BALB/c (Th2-prone) mouse recipients in an in vivo sensitization model. Two strains of mice were presensitized with Lewis rat splenocytes as xenogeneic antigens. We found that BALB/c recipients mounted a significantly higher total IgG response to the xeno-antigens when compared with C57BL/6 recipients, 10 days after rat splenocyte infusion. A Th2-mediated antibody response with high ratio of IgG1/IgG2a was seen in the BALB/c recipients, while a Th1 antibody response with low ratio of IgG1/IgG2a was detected in C57BL/6 recipients. CD11c(+)DC isolated from C57BL/6 recipients possessed increased expression of CD8alpha(+) (DC-1 type). The administration of bone marrow derived-DC from IL-12 knockout mice into C57BL/6 recipients induced a shift of Th-mediated anti-xenogeneic antibody responses from Th1 to Th2 domain. Our findings suggest that DC could play an important role to regulate the balance of Th1/Th2 cytokine profiles and rejection patterns in xenotransplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".