MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965355711 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181f52549

Discussion: Do Not Use Epinephrine in Digital Blocks: Myth or Truth? Part II. A Retrospective Review of 1111 Cases

2010· review· en· W1965355711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologySAINTSuiteRelation (database)Library scienceMedicineHistoryArt historyPolitical scienceLawClassicsComputer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University. Received for publication June 28, 2010; accepted June 30, 2010. Disclosure:The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this Discussion or of the associated article. Donald H. Lalonde, M.D., Division of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Hilyard Place, Suite C204, 600 Main Street, Saint John, New Brunswick E2K 1J5, Canada, [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it