Prolonged moderate-intensity exercise oxygen uptake response following heavy-intensity priming exercise with short- and longer-term recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the effects of recovery duration following heavy-intensity "priming" exercise (Hvy) on pulmonary oxygen (O2) uptake (V̇O2p) during subsequent prolonged moderate-intensity exercise (Mod). Nine participants (6 men and 3 women) (27 ± 7 years) each completed 3 repetitions of 2 continuous Mod 1-Hvy-Mod 2 leg-cycling protocols in which Mod 2 lasted 30 min, but was preceded by a recovery duration of either 6 (R6) or 20 (R20) min at 20 W following Hvy; in each case, Mod 1 and Hvy lasted 6 min and were preceded by 6 min at 20 W. V̇O2p, heart rate (HR), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived muscle deoxygenation ([HHb]) responses were modeled as a monoexponential; additionally, 60-s averages were computed every 6 min in Mod 1 and Mod 2. V̇O2p was elevated (p < 0.05) throughout Mod 2 compared with Mod 1 in both R6 and R20 (by -82 mL·min(-1) or ∼5.0%); this occurred despite a complete recovery of baseline V̇O2p (V̇O2pBsln) following R20. HR and minute ventilation (V̇E), but not [HHb], were also elevated throughout Mod 2. The phase II time constant for V̇O2p (τV̇O2p) was reduced in Mod 2 (22 s (Mod 1), 19 s (Mod 2); p < 0.05), as was the "overshoot" in the normalized [HHb]/O2 uptake ratio (p < 0.05). This study shows that V̇O2p was elevated during Mod following Hvy, regardless of recovery duration; however, a determining role for V̇O2pBsln is precluded. Furthermore, neither V̇O2p, HR, nor V̇E showed any evidence of a readjustment back to no-Hvy conditions during prolonged Mod (p > 0.05). Lastly, regardless of recovery duration, τV̇O2p was reduced to a similar extent with Hvy, likely resulting from an improved matching of local muscle O2 delivery to O2 utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".