Independent Validation of a Model Predicting the Need for Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion at Liver Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may be associated with major blood loss and equally considerable transfusion requirements. We had developed previously a model capable of predicting the probability of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion. We tested the ability of that model in predicting the need for PRBC transfusion after its conversion into the nomogram format, which represents a friendly tool to be used. Moreover, the nomogram was validated in an independent cohort of 109 prospectively gathered OLTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 515 OLTs were performed by a group of 17 anesthesiologists and 7 hepatobiliary surgeons. The initial series of 406 OLTs were used for model development. The remaining 109 OLTs were used as an independent validation cohort. Logistic regression analyses addressed the relationship between the three previously identified predictors of the likelihood of PRBC transfusion and the actual rate of PRBC transfusion. The predictors consisted of plasma transfusion status, phlebotomy, and immediate preoperative hemoglobin value. The regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model that included all three predictors were used to develop a nomogram predicting the individual probability of PRBC transfusion. RESULTS: In univariable models, transfusion of plasma (odds ratio [OR] 15.0, P<0.001) increased the rate of PRBC transfusion. Conversely, phlebotomy (OR 0.06, P<0.001) and a high starting hemoglobin level (OR 0.95, P<0.001) had a protective effect. In the multivariable model, all three variables reached independent predictor status (P<0.001). The bootstrap-adjusted area under curve (AUC) of the model was 89.8%. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram represents the first model capable of predicting the individual risk of PRBC transfusion at OLT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".