A Stress-State Related Void Coalescence Criterion and its Validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a new critical void volume fraction (fc) criterion that identifies the onset of void coalescence based on the stress state of the material as compared to the definition of the phenomenological criterion by Tvergaard and Needleman [1], where void coalescence is predicted based merely on a constant value for critical void volume fraction. The new fc criterion is obtained using the finite element analysis of the unit cell model of clustered voids. Validation of this new criterion is done by implementing the new coalescence criterion into the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) [1-3] model and simulating the ductile fracture experiment of a series of angularly notched sheet samples of dual phase (DP), advanced high strength steels (AHSS). A methodology has been devised to construct a stress triaxiality-based void coalescence criterion. Validation of the methodology has been performed using tensile tests of angularly notched samples of DP490 AHSS. Experimental data is compared with FE simulations in order to verify the dependency of void coalescence on stress triaxiality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".