MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965388719 · doi:10.1002/cne.10299

Remodeling of the proximal segment of crayfish motor nerves following transection

2002· article· en· W1965388719 on OpenAlexaff
Joanne Pearce, C. K. Govind

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAxonSomaBiologySproutingAnatomySynaptic vesicleAxoplasmic transportAxon terminalAxon hillockNeuroscienceFree nerve endingAxotomyVesicleCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transected crustacean motor axons consist of a soma-endowed proximal segment that regenerates and a soma-less distal segment that survives for up to a year. We report on the anatomical remodeling of the proximal segment of phasic motor nerves innervating the deep flexor muscles in the abdomen of adult crayfish following transection. The intact nerve with 10 phasic axons and its two branches with subsets of 6 and 7 of these 10 axons undergo several remodeling changes. First, the transected nerve displays many more and smaller axon profiles than the 6 and 7 axons of the intact nerve, approximately 100 and 300 profiles in the two branches of a preparation transected 8 weeks previously. Serial images of the transected nerve denote that the proliferation of profiles is due to several orders of axon sprouting primary, secondary, and tertiary branches. The greater proliferation of axon sprouts, their smaller size, and the absence of intervening glia in the one nerve branch compared with the other branch denote that sprouting is more advanced in this branch. Second, the axon sprouts are regionally differentiated; thus, although in most regions the sprouts are basically axon-like, with a cytoskeleton of microtubules and peripheral mitochondria, in some regions they appear nerve terminal-like and are characterized by numerous clear synaptic vesicles, a few dense-core vesicles, and dispersed mitochondria. Both regions possess active zone dense bars with clustered synaptic vesicles found opposite other sprouts, glia, hemocytes, and connective tissue, but because the opposing membranes are not differentiated into a synaptic contact, the active zones are extrasynaptic. Third, some of the transected axons display a glial cell nucleus denoting assimilation of an adaxonal glial cell by the transected axons. Fourth, within the nerve trunk are a few myocytes and muscle fibers. These most likely originate from adjoining and intimately connected hemocytes, because such transformation occurs during muscle repair. In a crustacean nerve, however, where muscle is clearly misplaced, its presence implies an instructive role for motor nerves in muscle formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207