MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965390955 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2014.0319

Low‐cost high gain printed log‐periodic dipole array antenna with dielectric lenses for V‐band applications

2014· article· en· W1965390955 on OpenAlex
Osama M. Haraz, Saleh A. Alshebeili, Abdel‐Razik Sebak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsDipole antennaDielectricHigh-gain antennaDipoleAntenna (radio)OpticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three different V‐band high gain printed log periodic dipole array (PLPDA) antenna prototypes are proposed. The antenna prototypes are fabricated and tested. A good agreement between the experimental and simulated results is obtained. Results show that those antenna prototypes can operate from 42 to 82 GHz with a fractional impedance bandwidth of 64.5% covering the whole V‐band (50–75 GHz). At 60 GHz, the three antenna prototypes have peak gain of 12.64, 23.31 and 26.79 dBi with a gain variation of 3.5 dBi across the whole V‐band with stable radiation patterns over the operating band. The proposed PLPDA antenna prototypes achieve good side‐lobe suppression, excellent front‐to‐back ratio in both E ‐ and H ‐planes and low cross‐polarisation levels over the entire frequency range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it