Probing Chitosan and Phospholipid Interactions Using Langmuir and Langmuir−Blodgett Films as Cell Membrane Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction between chitosan and Langmuir and Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) films of dimyristoyl phosphatidic acid (DMPA) is investigated, with the films serving as simplified cell membrane models. At the air-water interface, chitosan modulates the structural properties of DMPA monolayers, causing expansion and decreasing the monolayer elasticity. As the surface pressure increased, some chitosan molecules remained at the interface, but others were expelled. Chitosan could be transferred onto solid supports alongside DMPA using the LB technique, as confirmed by infrared spectroscopy and quartz crystal microbalance measurements. The analysis of sum-frequency vibration spectroscopy data for the LB films combined with surface potential measurements for the monolayers pointed to chitosan inducing the ordering of the DMPA alkyl chains. Furthermore, the morphology of DMPA LB films, studied with atomic force microscopy, was affected significantly by the incorporation of chitosan, with the mixed chitosan-DMPA films displaying considerably higher thickness and roughness, in addition to chitosan aggregates. Because chitosan affected DMPA films even at pressures characteristic of cell membranes, we believe this study may help elucidate the role of chitosan in biological systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it