Key performance assessment of fuel cell based distributed energy generation system in resilient micro energy grid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed energy generation (DG) in micro energy grid (MEG) is anticipated to subjugate the shortcomings in current energy supply. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) has been serving well in the automotive application and holds promises as a potential distributed generation technology. However, before qualifying as a potential technology, it must ensure high reliability, efficient utilization of recourses, and subjugate environmental impacts. The paper discusses the dynamic behavior of both standalone and grid connected closed loop controlled PEMFC distributed generation system. Moreover, based on the dynamic response, the key performance indicators (power quality, load response, efficiency etc.) have been evaluated. The results indicate that PEMFC can provide high quality power with acceptable THD and can cope with the rapid load change in the network. Besides, during heavily loaded grid connected condition, it can provide sufficient amount of real and reactive power to maintain the grid power quality. Finally, we have evaluated economic and environmental indicators for systems with fuel cell based power generation and fuel cell based micro-CHP. However, economy analysis of the system depicts that using PEMFC for only electricity generation does not qualify for efficient resource utilization. Thus, the paper suggests the use of fuel cell based CHP to ensure maximum utilization of natural resources while increase the system efficiency up to 90%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".