MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965501796 · doi:10.1080/15567030903261832

A Modified Differential Evolution Optimization Algorithm with Random Localization for Generation of Best-Guess Properties in History Matching

2011· article· en· W1965501796 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential evolutionConvergence (economics)Matching (statistics)AlgorithmComputer scienceSimplex algorithmSimplexMeta-optimizationMathematical optimizationOptimization problemMathematicsLinear programming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Computer aided history matching techniques are increasingly playing a role in reservoir characterization. This article describes the implementation of a differential evolution optimization algorithm to carry out reservoir characterization by conditioning the reservoir simulation model to production data (history matching). We enhanced the differential evolution algorithm and developed the modified differential evolution optimization method with random localization. The proposed technique is simple-structured, robust, and computationally efficient. We also investigated the convergence characteristics of the algorithm in some synthetic oil reservoirs. In addition, the proposed method is compared with the Nelder-Mead simplex search method and a standard Genetic algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it