Early versus delayed repair of vesicouterine fistula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vesicouterine fistulas (VUF) are a pathological and uncommon connection between the uterus and the bladder. Although rare, they are usually related to cesarean section. Nowadays, their incidence increases because of the increase in Cesarean sections. Patients with VUF may have various clinical presentations. The main symptoms are urinary incontinence, which may be associated with hematuria. Vesicouterine fistulas are usually associated with psychological distress and have a negative effect on quality of life. The accurate and early diagnosis of VUF can be difficult. There are multiple ways to investigate VUF and several examinations may be required to confirm the diagnosis; these examinations may include a cystoscopy, a retrograde cystography, methylene blue test and a computed tomography scan. We present 3 cases of vesicouterine fistula with successful surgical repair in which 2 patients had an early repair. One patient had an early surgical repair because of intractable pain and the other patient because of the large size of the fistula. The fistula repair surgeries were uneventful and the patients had an unremarkable recovery. We report that early surgical management is technically feasible without significantly increasing the difficulty of the surgery, with an excellent outcome in selected patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".