Event-related potentials reveal the effects of altering personal identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subjects were presented with terminal words that identified a sentence to reflect their true selves or another irrelevant individual. Subjects were asked to push one button if the statement reflected their true identity and another if it did not. The ERP to the terminal word consisted of a double-peaked positivity. Both the initial P300 (peaking between 300-350 ms) and a later P550 (peaking between 550 and 575 ms) were significantly larger to words that reflected the subject's true identity. When subjects were asked to take on a new identity, the P300 became larger to new, false words but the later P550 was large to both the false and the true words. The P550 to true identity words became smaller over a period of 3 days as subjects rehearsed their new roles. However, the P550 remained large to the false identity words although it was now attenuated relative to the true identity words. The late positivities may reflect a complex decisional process involving at least two stages. The initial stage might the initial yes-no decision. The later positivity may reflect the personal relevance of the terminal word. In this case, one's own true identity only begins to lose its relevance after time, and enacting the false identity then increases the positivity to this new identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".