MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965531865 · doi:10.1142/s0129054105003364

RESTRICTED SETS OF TRAJECTORIES AND DECIDABILITY OF SHUFFLE DECOMPOSITIONS

2005· article· en· W1965531865 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Domaratzki, Kai Salomaa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Foundations of Computer Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecidabilityUnary operationMathematicsRegular languageContext (archaeology)Set (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsContext-free languageCombinatoricsComputer scienceAutomatonTheoretical computer scienceProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceRule-based machine translation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decidability of the shuffle decomposition problem for regular languages is a long standing open question. We consider decompositions of regular languages with respect to shuffle along a regular set of trajectories and obtain positive decidability results for restricted classes of trajectories. Also we consider decompositions of unary regular languages. Finally, we establish in the spirit of the Dassow-Hinz undecidability result an undecidability result for regular languages shuffled along a fixed linear context-free set of trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Foundations of Computer ScienceSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207