MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965535120 · doi:10.1080/10586458.2014.928656

Kronecker Constants of Arithmetic Progressions

2014· article· en· W1965535120 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Mathematics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFunctional Equations Stability Results
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsKronecker deltaInteger (computer science)CombinatoricsBounded functionConstant (computer programming)Set (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsArithmetic progressionUpper and lower boundsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove that for every positive integer d and for all θ ∈ {0, 1/2}d − 1, there is at least one real number x such that where ⟨u⟩ is the distance from u to the set of integers. The bound 1/2 − 1/d is best possible and is necessary for θ = (1/2, …, 1/2). Consequently, the angular Kronecker constant of {1, … , d − 1} is bounded below by 1/2 − 1/d. We also exhibit a minimal (finite) set of points x such that given θ ∈ {0, 1/2}d − 1, there is some x in the set such that max n⟨θn − nx⟩ ≤ 1/2 − 1/d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it