Inscrire la mémoire semi-nomade dans l’actualité sédentaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, la société québécoise, après avoir été très catholique, a connu un fort mouvement de sécularisation. Face à la désertion des lieux de culte, s’est engagé un débat sur la place des biens d’Église dans le domaine public. Qu’en est-il dans les communautés amérindiennes du Québec, qui comptent aussi chacune une église ? Cet article retrace l’histoire de deux églises de missions, interrogeant leurs places dans la mémoire des oblats de Marie Immaculée et des Amérindiens algonquins et atikamekw. En étudiant les investissements symboliques des différents acteurs sociaux, les auteurs montrent que ces églises, lieux de mémoire polysémiques où l’ornementation évoque le semi-nomadisme, ont inscrit dans l’espace un modèle de type post-colonial, catholique et sédentaire. Mais, dans la réorganisation contemporaine des cadres identitaires, elles représentent aussi un début de décolonisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".