Predicting temporal lobe epileptic seizures based on zero-crossing interval analysis in scalp EEG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel real-time patient-specific algorithm to predict epileptic seizures is proposed. The method is based on the analysis of the positive zero-crossing intervals in the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), describing the brain dynamics. In a moving-window analysis, the histogram of these intervals in each EEG epoch is computed, and the distribution of the histogram value in specific bins, selected using interictal and preictal references, is estimated based on the values obtained from the current epoch and the epochs of the last 5 min. The resulting distribution for each selected bin is then compared to two reference distributions (interictal and preictal), and a seizure prediction index is developed. Comparing this index with a patient-specific threshold for all EEG channels, a seizure prediction alarm is finally generated. The algorithm was tested on approximately 15.5 hours of multichannel scalp EEG recordings from three patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, including 14 seizures. 86% of seizures were predicted with an average prediction time of 20.8 min and a false prediction rate of 0.12/hr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".