MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

COST OF FALLS INJURY HOSPITALISATIONS IN OLDER ADULTS: FOCUS ON AGE, SEX, AND AREA OF RESIDENCE

2012· article· en· W1965568260 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shanthi Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueInjury Prevention · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidenceMedicineDemographyInjury preventionPoison controlGerontologyRural areaOccupational safety and healthPopulationSuicide preventionEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Falls are common among older adults around the world. Several complex risk factors contribute to falls and many promising and proven falls prevention strategies have been reported in the literature. While the cost of falls have been examined, the variation in costs based on age, sex and area of residence such as rural and urban settings have not been examined. Purpose This study was carried out to assess the direct cost of falls injury hospitalisations in older residents aged 65+ years (seniors) and their implications on health care delivery in the growing seniors population in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. Methods We performed descriptive and statistical analyses on hospital records of seniors hospitalised with fall injury diagnoses from 1995/96 to 2004/05. We derived the direct cost using length of stay (LOS), resource intensity weight (RIW) and average cost of acute care (COST) for each year. The costs were calculated for different age groups (65–74, 75–84, 85+), sex (male, female), and area of residence at time of injury (rural, urban, and north). Results A total of 30 757 fall injury hospitalisations were recorded over a 10-year period. In addition, the fall injury hospitalisation rate varied with higher rates with advancing age, female gender, and rural location of residence. The average (±SE) 10-year RIW, LOS and COST were 2.13 (±0.02), 13.66 (±0.23) days and $6088 (±61.88), respectively. We observed statistically significant differences (p<0.01) in the RIW and COST of hospitalisations across the 10 years, both sexes, age groups and 13 health regions in the province. All of these factors except sex were significant (p<0.01) for the LOS. Males had slightly higher LOS and COST than females, while both LOS and COST increased with advancing age. Significant decline in LOS and COST occurred over the 10-year period. Both LOS and COST in the cases who died in hospital were more than double the values in those who survived. The COST was higher in cosmopolitan urban and Northern areas of the province as compared to other urban and rural areas. Significance and Contribution to the Field An increasing trend in burden of direct health care costs associated with falls injury hospitalisation among Saskatchewan senior residents is evident. This would have implications in planning and budgeting for future health care needs of the growing population of seniors in the province and particularly in the heavily impacted regions and areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInjury PreventionSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207