L'art des femmes et la question identitaire, une interrogation sur sa portée sociale et politique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Notre propos consiste à considérer à partir des pratiques artistiques des femmes souventes fois qualifiées d’art identitaire, comment celles-ci effectuent le traitement des identités, traitement qui ne souscrit plus à une succession de formes et de styles auxquels l’histoire de l’art nous avait habitués. Celles-ci tendent à problématiser les repères de l’identité plutôt que de les définir de sorte que la pratique artistique des femmes s’apparente à un processus allant de la quête d’une affirmation - reconnaissance des femmes et de leur art au déploiement d’une posture critique déconstructive permettant de rendre compte par des formes inédites et diversifiées de la pluralité autant formelle que sociale de la question identitaire ; ce qui n’est pas sans portée sociale et politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".