MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965595947 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n6p92

Regional Agriculture, Food Supply Systems and Competitiveness of Agriculture Prodiction Industries in Stavropol Territory

2015· article· en· W1965595947 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elena Nikolaevna Lapina, Natalia Vladimirovna Sobchenko, Larisa V. Kuleshova, Svetlana Yurievna Shamrina

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureProduct (mathematics)BusinessInvestment (military)PopulationRanking (information retrieval)Agricultural economicsFood securitySupply and demandNatural resource economicsGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the issue of ensuring the competitiveness of the agriculture and food system currently present in Stavropol Territory. Provision of the local population with locally manufactured food products in sufficient quantities and of the appropriate quality is one of the main challenges for the regional authorities. Assesment for the most advantageous trends for developing agriculture sector in Stavropol Krai considering its supply security, production costs and market demands for the manufactured products is quite essential. Results of the assesment ensured preparation of the market maps for Stavropol Territory with reference to the main product groups, that allowed to rank them in accordance with the identified indicators. To assess efficiency of the industries, the analysis of the investment strategic positions within the main agriculture product groups was prepared and involved imlementation of adjusted BCG matrix. Based on the obtained data the following was prepared: ranking for agricultural industries considering their socio-economic importance for the Stavropol Territory, and recommendations on the feasible trends for particular industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicAgricultural Development and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207