EXPOSURE TO FLAXSEED OR ITS PURIFIED LIGNAN DURING SUCKLING ONLY OR CONTINUOUSLY DOES NOT ALTER REPRODUCTIVE INDICES IN MALE AND FEMALE OFFSPRING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the reported health benefits of flaxseed, many Canadians are choosing to consume flaxseed or flaxseed-containing foods. However, the safety of exposure to flaxseed during early life such as the suckling period has not been studied, despite the fact that components in flaxseed with potential hormone-like effects can be transferred to nursing offspring via mother's milk. Previous investigations demonstrated that maternal feeding of a 10% flaxseed diet during pregnancy and lactation resulted in estrogenic effects on reproductive indices among male and female offspring. These effects were attributed to the potential estrogenic activity of enterodiol and enterolactone, the two major mammalian lignans that are converted from secoisolariciresinol diglycoside (SDG) in flaxseed by colonic bacteria; however, the effect of exposure to purified SDG at the level of a 10% flaxseed diet was not studied. The objective of this study was to determine whether maternal feeding of flaxseed during lactation altered reproductive indices in male and female offspring. Rat dams were fed basal diet (BD) or BD containing either 100% flaxseed (10F) or the equivalent quantity of SDG present in the 10% (10S) flaxseed diet from the start of lactation until pups were 21 d old. At the end of lactation (postnatal day IPND] 21), suckling pups either continued on the mother's diet or were switched to BD until adolescence (PND 50) or young adulthood (PND 132) to determine if continuous exposure to flaxseed or SDG altered reproductive indices. The reproductive indices that were measured included anogenital distance from birth through PND 21, age and body weight at puberty onset (females only), estrous cycle length, reproductive organ weights at PND 50 and 132, and histological analysis of reproductive organs (uterus, ovaries, prostate) at PND 132. There were no significant effects of exposing male or female offspring to flaxseed or SDG during suckling only or during suckling through the postsuckling period on any of the reproductive indices measured. These findings are in contrast to the estrogenic effects observed in male and female offspring exposed to flaxseed during fetal life through suckling and suggest that fetal life is a more hormone-sensitive period of development. Although maternal feeding of flaxseed during lactation appears to be safe with respect to reproductive indices among offspring, future investigation is required to elucidate whether there are any long-term implications with respect to fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".