Successful Treatment of Severe Infantile Hyperekplexia With Low-Dose Clobazam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report two cases of severe infantile hyperekplexia successfully treated with low-dose clobazam. The first case presented at 6 weeks of age with multiple episodes consisting of difficulty diapering because of stiffness and loud inspiratory noises followed by breath-holding in inspiration. She was diagnosed with hyperekplexia and started on clonazepam 0.05 mg daily. This was discontinued because of excessive sleepiness. The second case presented at 3 weeks of age with episodes of crying that would change in pitch and then abruptly stop, followed by leg and arm extension and stiffening. On occasion, there was cyanosis, and she received mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. She was diagnosed with hyperekplexia at 9 months of age. Both infants were treated with clobazam (0.25 and 0.3 mg/kg/day respectively), resulting in resolution of symptoms with no side effects. During treatment, both had minimal startle response to various stimuli and have now been successfully weaned from clobazam. Low-dose clobazam is effective in the treatment of hyperekplexia and is well tolerated in infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".