MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965643626 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2012.2206570

Dynamic Analysis of High-Order Laterally Coupled DFB Lasers Using Time-Domain Traveling-Wave Model

2012· article· en· W1965643626 on OpenAlex
Akram Akrout, Kais Dridi, Trevor J. Hall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuty cycleLaserOpticsGratingTime domainSemiconductor laser theoryMaterials scienceLongitudinal modeDiffraction gratingOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the application of a time-domain modeling approach for a laterally coupled distributed feedback (LC-DFB) semiconductor laser for the first time. We numerically study the effect of the radiation modes on LC-DFB laser properties. We integrate the Streifer's coefficients, which represent the effects of radiation and evanescent modes into the time-domain coupled-wave equations. High-order corrugated gratings with λ/4 phase-shift are analyzed, where the degree of longitudinal spatial hole burning can be effectively reduced by means of fine tuning of the grating duty cycle. Additionally, we show a remarkably enhanced side-mode suppression ratio (SMSR). For example, for the third-order gratings with a 50% duty cycle, an SMSR as high as 45 dB can be predicted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it