MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965662593 · doi:10.1136/thorax.57.7.608

Mid term effects of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy on clinical and cardiopulmonary function status

2002· article· en· W1965662593 on OpenAlex
M. C. Zoia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Pavia
KeywordsPulmonary thromboendarterectomyMedicineTerm (time)Intensive care medicineCardiologyPulmonary function testingCardiopulmonary bypassInternal medicineChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionPulmonary hypertension

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) can be successfully treated surgically by pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) but there are few data on mid-term cardiopulmonary function, particularly on exertion, and clinical benefits following pulmonary PTE. METHODS: A 2 year follow up study was undertaken of clinical status, haemodynamic and lung function indices, gas exchange, and exercise tolerance in 38 patients of mean (SD) age 50 (15) years who had undergone PTE. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was about 10%. Before PTE all the patients were severely impaired (NYHA classes III-IV). There was no time difference in the improvement in the parameters: nearly all the improvement in cardiac output, gas exchange, and clinical status was achieved in the first 3 months as a result of the relief of pulmonary obstruction. At 3 months the percentage of patients with normal cardiac output and PaO(2) and of those with reduced clinical impairment increased to 97%, 59%, and 87%, respectively, without any further change. Only mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), carbon monoxide transfer factor (TLCO), and exercise tolerance improved gradually during the second year, probably due to the recovery of the damaged small vessels. TLCO was overestimated before PTE but afterwards the trend was similar to that of mPAP. CONCLUSIONS: At mid term only a few patients did not have a satisfactory recovery because of lack of operative success, hypertension relapse, or the effect of preoperative hypertension on vessels in non-obstructed segments. Most of the patients, even the more compromised ones, had excellent long lasting results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it