MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965676778 · doi:10.1517/14728220802600715

PCSK9 as a therapeutic target of dyslipidemia

2008· review· en· W1965676778 on OpenAlexafffund
Nabil G. Seidah

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPCSK9DyslipidemiaProprotein convertaseMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineCholesterolDiseaseLDL receptorLipoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), which promotes degradation of hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), has a role in plasma cholesterol metabolism. Its gene is associated with the development of familial hypercholesterolemia. mRNA silencing or inhibition of PCSK9-induced degradation of LDLR may be used to treat this disease. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: To summarize approaches proposed to reduce the levels of PCSK9 and/or its activity. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: mRNA knockdown approaches include the use of antisense oligonucleotides either as soluble phosphorothioates or locked nucleic acids and lipidoid nanoparticles embedded with small interfering RNAs. Passive immunization is also an option. Other strategies include inhibition of the zymogen activation of proPCSK9, or the interaction of PCSK9 with the EGF-A domain of the LDLR. The N-terminal prosegment and the C-terminal Cys-His rich domain (CHRD), are alternative targets. Annexin A2 specifically binds the CHRD and inhibits PCSK9 function, and Annexin A2 peptide mimics could pave the way for the development of novel PCSK9-inhibitory compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic TargetsSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207