MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965716286 · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-12-00221.1

Subseasonal Prediction of Wintertime North American Surface Air Temperature during Strong MJO Events

2013· article· en· W1965716286 on OpenAlexafffund
Marcel Rodney, Hai Lin, Jacques Derome

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMadden–Julian oscillationClimatologyDiabaticAnomaly (physics)Persistence (discontinuity)Environmental scienceSurface air temperatureMultivariate statisticsAtmospheric sciencesGeologyMeteorologyClimate changeGeographyOceanographyMathematicsConvectionPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A multivariable linear regression model is constructed based on the status of the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) and persistence in order to forecast wintertime surface air temperature anomalies over North America out to 4 pentads (20 days). The current and previous states of the MJO are utilized as predictors, based on the Real-time Multivariate (RMM) indices of Wheeler and Hendon. Beyond the persistence-driven first pentad, potentially useful skill is mainly observed during strong MJO events in phases 3, 4, 7, and 8, which correspond to a dipole diabatic heating anomaly in the tropical Indian Ocean and western Pacific. This skill is largely centered over the eastern United States and the Great Lakes region during pentads 2 and 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207