A meta-analysis of the effect of inspired oxygen concentration on the incidence of surgical site infection following cesarean section
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Meta-analysis answering a clinical question about oxygen concentration and surgical site infection; a synthesis method used, not studied.
This meta-analysis answers a clinical question about surgical-site infection after cesarean section rather than studying synthesis methodology.
Meta-analysis answering a clinical SSI/cesarean oxygen question; uses synthesis, does not study it.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
- Topic
- Surgical site infection prevention
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- London Health Sciences Centre
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- MedicineIncidence (geometry)Surgical site infectionSection (typography)Meta-analysisAnesthesiaObstetricsSurgeryInternal medicineOptics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no