MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965818384 · doi:10.1029/2006gl028009

Thermochemical structure and dynamics of the African superplume

2007· article· en· W1965818384 on OpenAlexaff
N. A. Simmons, A. M. Forte, S. P. Grand

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyancyMantle (geology)PlumeConvectionGeologyGeophysicsCore–mantle boundaryMechanicsPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new three‐dimensional (3‐D) model of the thermochemical structure of the African superplume region obtained from simultaneous inversion of global seismic and convection‐related data. Convection‐related observations include the global free‐air gravity field, tectonic plate motions, dynamic surface topography and the excess ellipticity of the core‐mantle boundary. A 3‐D image of the chemically‐induced density perturbations provides direct evidence that intrinsically‐dense material is entrained within the superplume and concentrated into a rounded structure ∼1000 km above the core‐mantle boundary. The thermally‐induced density perturbations are greater in magnitude than the chemically‐induced implying overall positive buoyancy throughout the superplume. The observed morphology and density signatures are consistent with a thermochemical plume that has risen from a compositionally‐distinct ‘pile’ at the base of the mantle and may be currently deforming under the influence of its intrinsic negative chemical buoyancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations214
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207