Sexual dimorphism in angiotensin II-induced hypertension and vascular alterations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sex differences in the degree of high blood pressure have been described in several forms of experimental animal models of hypertension. However, the influence of sex on angiotensin II-induced hypertension has not been studied. In the present study, we investigated and compared the effects of chronic angiotensin II treatment on blood pressure and vascular function in male and female rats. Chronic treatment with angiotensin II (0.7 mg/kg daily for 10 d) significantly raised arterial blood pressure in male but not female Sprague-Dawley rats; it upregulated the NAD(P)H oxidase gp67 phox subunit in the aorta of male but not female rats; and it exaggerated the vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine and serotonin in the mesenteric vascular bed (MVB) of male but not female rats. Vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (ACh) but not papaverine (PPV) or isoprenaline (ISO) were reduced in the MVB of angiotensin II-treated male but not female rats. ACh, but not PPV or ISO dilatory responses were potentiated in the MVB of angiotensin II-treated female rats. The present findings demonstrate that exogenous angiotensin II upregulates aortic NAD(P)H oxidase gp67 phox subunit, and induces hypertension and mesenteric vascular dysfunction only in male rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".