MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965827101 · doi:10.7202/1007578ar

Balises pour une histoire institutionnelle de la littérature prolétarienne et révolutionnaire (1920-1940)

2012· article· fr· W1965827101 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anthony Glinoer

Bibliographic record

VenueMémoires du livre · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cas à la fois emblématique et ambigu de littérature engagée, la littérature prolétarienne et révolutionnaire des années 1920-1940 a fait l’objet de nombreux travaux : que ce soit dans les cas de l’Allemagne, de la France, des États-Unis ou de la Russie soviétique, les principaux acteurs ont été identifiés, certaines oeuvres ont été republiées et il a été montré comment ces mouvements ont été encouragés puis déstructurés, au profit du seul réalisme socialiste, par l’Internationale communiste. Cependant, la dimension transnationale, voire mondiale, de ce mouvement littéraire, n’a pas été mise de l’avant, non plus que les profondes ressemblances entre les démarches institutionnelles menées d’un pays à l’autre dans ce domaine. Partant de sources critiques peu connues dans le monde francophone, cet article défriche ce terrain et dresse un état des lieux institutionnels de la littérature prolétarienne et révolutionnaire : groupes, revues, associations y sont considérés de façon à apporter un éclairage nouveau sur ce temps où, de par le monde, les ouvriers écrivaient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMémoires du livreSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207