Real-World Experience with Alitretinoin in a Community Dermatology Practice Setting in Patients with Chronic Hand Dermatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment of moderate to severe chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) has been advanced with the introduction of alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid). Although clinical trial data demonstrated the efficacy and safety of alitretinoin, real-world experience is lacking in a more generalized patient population. OBJECTIVE: Patients with CHD often, and unsuccessfully, attempt several therapeutic options before seeing a dermatologist. This chart review study aimed to examine the experience of using alitretinoin for CHD in a dermatology office setting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records was conducted of all patients prescribed alitretinoin in a community dermatology practice. RESULTS: Alitretinoin was well tolerated in this patient population of 53 patients and showed a clinically significant reduction in disease symptoms. CONCLUSION: Alitretinoin was a safe and well-tolerated treatment with significant clinical improvement in our patient population. Few clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were identified, and only one patient discontinued therapy due to adverse events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".