Photostability of Colloidal PbSe and PbSe/PbS Core/Shell Nanocrystals in Solution and in the Solid State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photostability of semiconductor PbSe nanocrystals (NCs) under different storage conditions and the photoluminescence of PbSe NC films on Si substrates under vacuum and under different atmospheres were investigated. The NCs show a small blue shift in both the emission and absorption spectra when stored in solution. This blue shift is accelerated when the particles are stored in room light compared to when the particles are stored in the dark, which indicates that photooxidation is an important process. The photooxidation process is accelerated by irradiating NC solutions with a 450 W xenon lamp. The photobleaching and appearance of a precipitate are attributed to ligand desorption followed by agglomeration. Reversible O 2 -induced luminescence quenching was observed on a PbSe NC film on Si substrates, which could be addressed by two mechanisms: indirect quenching by alteration of PbSe charging and neutralization dynamics or quenching through direct interaction of O 2 with the exciton. To improve the photostability of PbSe NCs, PbSe/PbS core/shell NCs using (TOP)S (TOP = trioctylphosphine) and TMS 2 S (TMS 2 = bis(trimethylsilyl)) as sulfur sources were prepared. However, PbSe/PbS core/shell NCs did not show an increased stability in solution upon irradiation with a xenon lamp when compared with PbSe core NCs. Either the PbS shell is not able to confine the charge carriers or there is incomplete shell passivation with the PbSe core, and as a result these core/shell NCs have comparable stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".