MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965855627 · doi:10.1139/v03-093

The dissolution of organic solvents from Amerlock 400 epoxy paint

2003· article· en· W1965855627 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joanne Ball, J. Clara Wren, John R. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissolutionChemistrySolventReaction rate constantEpoxyPolyurethaneXyleneDiffusionOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringBenzeneKinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dissolution of organic solvents from containment coatings into the sump water is expected to be a key rate-controlling process, influencing the pH, the steady-state water radiolysis product concentration, and the formation of organic iodides in containment following a postulated reactor accident. The dissolution process is therefore an important component in modelling iodine behaviour in post-accident containment. The rate of release of ethyl benzene and m- and o-xylene from Amerlock 400 epoxy paint in contact with water has been measured. The release rate was found to be comparable to the release rate of methyl isobutyl ketone from various polyurethane, vinyl, and epoxy paints. The pseudo-first-order rate constant for dissolution of the solvents from these containment coatings is dependent only upon paint thickness and temperature, whereas the total amount of solvent released depends upon paint thickness. The solvent-release process is governed by the rate of uptake of water by the coupons, a Fickian diffusion-controlled process.Key words: dissolution, kinetics, organic solvents, paint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207