MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965865394 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2012.2212171

On Beam Squint in Offset-Fed Reflectarrays

2012· article· en· W1965865394 on OpenAlex
Eqab Almajali, D.A. McNamara, J. Shaker, M. R. Chaharmir

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsOffset (computer science)Focal pointPhase centerPhysicsCenter frequencyBeam (structure)Aperture (computer memory)Phase (matter)Beam steeringCardinal pointAcousticsTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer scienceBand-pass filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A full-wave receive-mode analysis is used to show that it is the shift in the location of the focal point with frequency (caused by nonconstant path delays over the surface of the reflectarray) that is principally responsible for the beam squint that occurs in offset-fed reflectarray antennas, and not the element type used or the lattice size. A similar transmit-mode analysis confirms that it is this focal point shift that implies noncoincidence of the focal point and the feed phase center at off-center frequencies, which results in a phase distribution over the reflectarray aperture with a slope other than that required to have the main beam in the desired direction. We further demonstrate this fact (computationally and experimentally) by showing that if the feed is physically moved to the shifted focal point at some off-center frequency, the main beam pointing direction at this frequency is restored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it