MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965877647 · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-01-01298-4

The index calculus method using non-smooth polynomials

2001· article· en· W1965877647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLogarithmLimit (mathematics)Interval (graph theory)Upper and lower boundsCombinatoricsDegree (music)HeuristicVariable (mathematics)Prime (order theory)Discrete mathematicsCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a generalized version of the index calculus method for the discrete logarithm problem in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper F Subscript q"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mspace width="negativethinmathspace"/> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{\mathbb F}_{\! q}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , when <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="q equals p Superscript n"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">q=p^n</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="p"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">p</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a small prime and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="n right-arrow normal infinity"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false"> → </mml:mo> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> ∞ </mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">n\rightarrow \infty</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . The database consists of the logarithms of all irreducible polynomials of degree between given bounds; the original version of the algorithm uses lower bound equal to one. We show theoretically that the algorithm has the same asymptotic running time as the original version. The analysis shows that the best upper limit for the interval coincides with the one for the original version. The lower limit for the interval remains a free variable of the process. We provide experimental results that indicate practical values for that bound. We also give heuristic arguments for the running time of the Waterloo variant and of the Coppersmith method with our generalized database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it