MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965897448 · doi:10.1021/ma800777m

A Water-Soluble pH-Responsive Molecular Brush of Poly(<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) Grafted Polythiophene

2008· article· en· W1965897448 on OpenAlexafffund
Mingfeng Wang, Shan Zou, Gérald Guérin, Lei Shen, Kangqing Deng, Marcus Jones, Gilbert C. Walker, Gregory D. Scholes, Mitchell A. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolythiopheneSide chainMethacrylatePolymer chemistryProtonationPolymerAqueous solutionPolymer brushPolyelectrolyteChemistrySolubilityMaterials scienceConductive polymerMonomerOrganic chemistryPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis of a new polythiophene (PT)-based molecular brush (PT- g -PDMA) by growing poly( N,N -dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMA) chains from the PT backbone by ATRP. The polymer shows a reversible pH response in aqueous solution. A combination of AFM, light scattering, and 1 H NMR measurements indicated that the polymer brush forms a more extended conformation with a decrease in pH from 8 to 2 due to the protonation of the Me 2 N− groups and increased repulsive interactions among the PDMA side chains, which drives the red shift of the absorption and PL spectra of the PT backbone. The good solubility of this polythiophene-based brush in a wide range of solvents is attractive for the fabrication of functional polymer composites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations142
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207