Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les principes démocratiques des États occidentaux influencent de plus en plus la façon dont ceux-ci conduisent leurs relations internationales. Les acteurs parlementaires, par exemple, organisent des forums transnationaux afin de discuter de leurs perspectives sur la politique internationale. En Amérique latine, pourtant, cette tendance est limitée par la tradition présidentielle et par le caractère intergouvernemental du régionalisme. Comment donc la création d’un parlement au sein du Mercosur peut-elle être expliquée ? Cet article cherche à évaluer les raisons de la construction institutionnelle du Parlement du Mercosur au-delà du discours officiel. L’analyse, fondée sur le cadre théorique des « trois I » et sur des entretiens qualitatifs, identifie des facteurs liés aux institutions, aux intérêts et aux idées qui ont joué ensemble dans ce résultat politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".