MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965948449 · doi:10.1007/s11746-011-1949-y

Optimization of Enzymatic Synthesis of Phytosteryl Caprylates Using Response Surface Methodology

2011· article· en· W1965948449 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhuliang Tan, Fereidoon Shahidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgilent Technologies
KeywordsResponse surface methodologySolubilityCentral composite designYield (engineering)ChemistryCaprylic acidMelting pointSubstrate (aquarium)ChromatographyMaterials scienceFood scienceOrganic chemistryFatty acidMetallurgyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Phytosterols are known to lower total blood cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. However, low solubility of phytosterols in edible oils and their high melting point limit their use in food products. Esterification of phytosterols with fatty acids will render them higher solubility in oils and lowers their melting points. In this work, caprylic acid (C8:0) was selected for the esterification process because it serves as a rapid energy source with little or no deposition in the body and is often recommended by nutritionists for the treatment of candidiasis due to its antimicrobial properties. Here optimization of enzymatic synthesis of phytosteryl caprylates using response surface methodology (RSM) was investigated. The optimization process used a face‐centred central composite design (CCD) and under optimized conditions (9.25 h, 2.15 substrate mole ratio, and 7.93% enzyme load) the resultant conversion yield was 98%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismFrench-language works237,207