MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

‘Dead-in-bed’ syndrome - a diabetes nightmare

2008· article· en· W1965951189 on OpenAlexaff
Dror Koltin, Denis Daneman

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Diabetes · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNightmareHypoglycemiaDiabetes mellitusPediatricsGlycemicDiseaseType 1 diabetesIntensive care medicineType 2 diabetesInternal medicinePsychiatryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report in this study the death in bed of a 14-yr-old girl with type 1 diabetes and a review of the existing literature on this topic. Diagnosed at 5 yr of age, the patient followed a relatively benign disease course. Hemoglobin A1c was 6.6-8.4%, and there were no hospital admissions apart from the one at diagnosis. Hypoglycemic episodes were not excessive or severe. At age 14 yr, the patient was found dead in bed after having been well the night before. No apparent explanation could be provided. The 'dead-in-bed' syndrome accounts for 5-6% of mortality cases in patients with type 1 diabetes, amounting to two to six cases per 10 000 patient years. Theories attempting to explain the mechanism for this syndrome include hypoglycemia or cardiac autonomic dysfunction. This case emphasizes several problems faced by clinicians: the risk for sudden death in youth with diabetes, which may compromise good glycemic control, the question of early detection of autonomic dysfunction, and the need to understand this phenomenon better and search for preventive measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric DiabetesSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207