Base Station and Relay Station Broadband Network Planning Using Immune Quantum Evolutionary Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present simultaneous planning technique for Base Stations (BSs) and Relay Stations (RSs) for a broadband wireless network while taking data flow also known as link flow into consideration. Infrastructure cost (BS cost, RS cost and their operational costs) of a wireless network proves to be a key factor for network service providers while planning a network. The objective of this study is to help determine the set of BSs and RSs that can serve all the subscribed users and fulfill their demands at the lowest cost to the utility firm. This problem setup can be used for laying new networks as well as enhancing the already existing ones. The combinatorial optimization problem at hand is NP-hard in nature. We formulate this problem as a non-linear discrete optimization problem and compare two recent Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) in providing approximate solution to this problem. The Quantum Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (QEA) is a probabilistic algorithm based on quantum computing with the concept of qubits and superposition of states. The Immune theory based Immune Quantum Evolutionary Algorithm (IQEA) adopts immune operator to raise the fitness and prevent deterioration during the evolutionary process. Simulation results show better performance of IQEA as compared to QEA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".