MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965999422 · doi:10.1089/scd.2009.0240

The Emerging Role of SOX Transcription Factors in Pancreatic Endocrine Cell Development and Function

2009· review· en· W1965999422 on OpenAlexafffund
Erin McDonald, Mansa Krishnamurthy, Cynthia G. Goodyer, Rennian Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cells and Development · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's HospitalChildren’s Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Research BoardCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsBiologyTranscription factorProgenitor cellPancreasEndocrine systemEnteroendocrine cellCell biologyTranscription (linguistics)IsletProgenitorPancreatic isletsMorphogenesisStem cellInternal medicineEndocrinologyCancer researchGeneticsDiabetes mellitusHormoneGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition of pancreatic progenitor cells to mature beta cells is regulated by the interaction of several transcription factors, including members of the sex-determining region on Y box (SOX) family of transcription factors. The SOX proteins are widely involved in cell fate determination and the development of several tissues, including bone, heart, gonads, lymphocytes, and glial cells as well as the pancreas. In this review, we will present recent findings that illustrate the critical role of SOX transcription factors in maintaining pancreatic progenitor cell pools and in controlling pancreatic islet morphogenesis and islet function. Interrelationships between the SOX family and other pancreatic transcription factors specific to endocrine lineages will also be discussed in light of islet cell-based therapies for the treatment of diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cells and DevelopmentSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207