Species identity and aqueous calcium concentrations as determinants of calcium concentrations of freshwater crustacean zooplankton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calcium (Ca) is a major component of the crustacean zooplankton carapace. As crustacean zooplankton obtain most of their Ca from lake water, taxa with high Ca demands may be negatively affected if environmental Ca concentrations fall below thresholds necessary for adequate Ca uptake rates. Currently, Ca concentrations are falling in many soft-water lakes with a history of acid deposition, both within Canada and globally. Hence, there is a need to identify species with high Ca demands. We analyzed Ca concentrations of eight crustacean zooplankton taxa from nine lakes spanning a 0.435 mg·L 1 Ca gradient. Our objectives were to determine (i) if both species identity and lake Ca concentrations are determinants of zooplankton Ca concentration and (ii) if zooplankton Ca concentration varies seasonally. Large differences in Ca concentrations were observed among taxa. Levels in Daphnia sp. ranged from 2% to 8% of dry body weight, whereas levels in copepods and non-daphniid cladocera were much lower at 0.2%0.4%. Seasonal variation in zooplankton Ca concentration was negligible, but positive correlations with lake Ca concentration were detected, with up to twofold differences in Ca concentration between lakes in three of the eight species. Species identity was the most important determinant of crustacean zooplankton Ca concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".