MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966021915 · doi:10.1177/1090820x13478971

Commentary on: Metabolic and Structural Effects of Phosphatidylcholine and Deoxycholate Injections on Subcutaneous Fat: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

2013· letter· en· W1966021915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAesthetic Surgery Journal · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialLipolysisPhosphatidylcholineInternal medicineAdipose tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effects of Phosphatidylcholine and Deoxycholate Injections onSubcutaneous Fat: A Randomized, Controlled Trial," Reeds et al analyzed the effects of phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate (PC-DC) treatments on body composition, adipocyte function, and mechanisms responsible for fat loss.Thirteen women were enrolled; only 7 completed the study.This small sample size renders statistically significant calculations virtually impossible.The authors maintain that PC-DC injections have become increasingly popular.This may be true in Seoul, Korea, where over 6000 vials of Lipobean 1 are injected monthly into human subcutaneous fat for the purpose of fat reduction.However, in many countries around the world, the practice of injection lipolysis has been banned. 2opularity of these injections in the United States has dwindled, 3 in part due to the lack of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agent and also due to the lack of efficacy in treating larger body regions. 4The side effects, although not morbid, are unpleasant.Noninvasive treatments such as Liposonix (Solta Medical, Inc, Bothell, Washington) and Tite FX (Invasix, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada) 5,6 offer much more fat reduction without the cholinergic side effects that can be seen with higher-dose PC-DC injections.Despite the shortcomings of injection lipolysis as currently practiced, there has been a resurgence of interest in the topic, 7 especially in Europe and Asia.There are many reasons for this, including the expansion of the practice of aesthetic medicine and the desire of practitioners who mainly perform injections to have an injectable solution for reduction of protrusions.If aesthetic practitioners can fill hollow regions, they may also want to reduce or take away volume.The ability to do this precisely with an injection would be an excellent addition to the cosmetic injector's options.The mechanism of action of PC-DC injections has been explored by several investigators, although none employed the breadth of testing presented in this study.The conjecture by Rotunda et al 8 that the detergent effect of sodium

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it