A FEATURE OF STELLAR DENSITY DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE TIDAL RADIUS OF GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 6626 (M28) IN THE GALACTIC BULGE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using wide-field J , H , and K s images obtained with the WIRCam near-infrared camera on the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope, we investigated the spatial density configuration of stars within the tidal radius of metal-poor globular cluster NGC 6626, which is known to be located near the bulge region and have a thick-disk orbit motion. In order to trace the stellar density around a target cluster, we sorted the cluster's member stars using a mask-filtering algorithm and weighted the stars on the color–magnitude diagram. From the weight-summed surface density map, we found that the spatial density distribution of stars within the tidal radius is asymmetric with distorted overdensity features. The extending overdensity features are likely associated with the effects of the dynamic interaction with the Galaxy and the cluster's space motion. An interesting finding is that the prominent overdensity features extend toward the direction of the Galactic plane. This orientation of stellar density distribution can be interpreted with the result of the disk-shock effect of the Galaxy, previously experienced by the cluster. Indeed, the radial surface density profile accurately describes this overdensity feature with a break in the slope inside the tidal radius. Thus, the observed results indicate that NGC 6626 experienced a strong dynamical interaction with the Galaxy. Based on the result of strong tidal interaction with the Galaxy and previously published results, we discussed possible origins and evolutions of the cluster: (1) the cluster might have formed in satellite galaxies that were merged and created the Galactic bulge region in the early universe, after which time its dynamical properties were modified by dynamical friction, or (2) the cluster might have formed in primordial and rotationally supported massive clumps in the thick disk of the Galaxy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".