MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966037505 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2010.1141

On the Design of a Class of Odd-Length Biorthogonal Wavelet Filter Banks for Signal and Image Processing

2010· article· en· W1966037505 on OpenAlexafffund
Aryaz Baradarani, Pankajkumar Mendapara, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBiorthogonal systemBiorthogonal waveletWaveletElliptic filterQuadrature mirror filterWavelet transformStopbandFilter bankFocus (optics)MathematicsFilter (signal processing)Composite image filterAlgorithmPassbandComputer scienceFilter designDiscrete wavelet transformImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligencePrototype filterComputer visionOpticsPhysicsBand-pass filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce an approach to the design of odd-length biorthogonal wavelet filter banks based on semidefinite programming employing Bernstein polynomials. The method is systematic and renders a simple optimization problem, yet it offers wavelet filters ranging from maximally flat to maximal passband/stopband width. The odd-length biorthogonal filter pairs are then used in multi-focus imaging to obtain a fully-focused image from a set of registered semi-focused input images at varying focus employing the distance transform and exponentially decaying function on the subbands in wavelet domain. Various images are tested and experimental results compare favorably to recent results in literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207