MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966070730 · doi:10.7202/017492ar

De la méditation sur le crâne à la représentation de soi-même à l’heure de la mort

2008· article· fr· W1966070730 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Essam Safty

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le réveil de l’ardeur morale à l’âge baroque se traduisit en autres par l’apparition d’un nouveau discours sur la mort, le quotidie morior , lequel requiert une constante préparation à la mort par le biais de divers exercices spirituels propres à familiariser les hommes avec l’idée de la mort, à leur en rappeler l’imminence, et à les tenir constamment dans l’état le plus propice à l’accueillir. La méditation sur le crâne et les efforts de vision apriorique du cérémonial de sa propre mort sont au nombre de ces exercices, qui s’inscrivent dans le cadre général d’un humanisme dévot opérant une solide synthèse entre dogmes anciens et morale chrétienne, et conférant ainsi, au nom d’une morale pratique ou utilitaire, leurs fondements rationnels ou mystiques à certaines vieilles conceptions idéologiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207