MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966076063 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v4n4p81

Similarity Form, Similarity Variational Element and Similarity Solution to (2+1) Dimensional Breaking Solition Equation

2012· article· en· W1966076063 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lichun Pu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSimilarity (geometry)Similarity solutionPartial differential equationElement (criminal law)Mathematical analysisBurgers' equationApplied mathematicsLawComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the thoughts and methods of ordinary deferential equation of dimensional non-linear partial deferential equation with (2+1) dimensional non-linear partial deferential equation will be analysed first, then the authors deduce the universal similarity form and similarity variational element of (2+1) dimensional breaking solution equation and its suitable deferential equation and find the similarity solition to (2+1) dimensional breaking solition equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207