MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966079507 · doi:10.1081/erc-100106009

EVIDENCE OF APOPTOSIS IN THE CASTRATION-INDUCED ATROPHY OF THE RAT LEVATOR ANI MUSCLE

2001· article· en· W1966079507 on OpenAlexafffund
Guylain Boissonneault

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClusterin in disease pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTestosterone propionateApoptosisCastrationDNA fragmentationClusterinEndocrinologyAtrophyInternal medicineFragmentation (computing)AndrogenProgrammed cell deathBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apoptosis or programmed cell death has been previously reported in androgen-responsive tissue such as the prostate. We tested the hypothesis that apoptosis may also represent a component of the castration-induced atrophy of the sexually dimorphic levator ani (LA) muscle of the male rat. Gonadectomy (GDX) induced a severe decrease in the LA muscle wet weight accompanied by important modifications in cytoarchitecture including an increase in myofibrillar interspace and condensed mitochondria. These alterations were almost completely reversed after 7 days of testosterone propionate replacement therapy (GDX + TP). In GDX rats, internucleosomal DNA fragmentation was confirmed by both agarose gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy. DNA fragmentation was no longer detected in GDX + TP rats. In GDX rats, overexpression of the trpm-2/clusterin gene, used as an early marker of apoptosis, further confirmed that an apoptotic response, typical of androgen-responsive tissues, is taking place following androgen withdrawal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrine ResearchSame topicClusterin in disease pathologyFrench-language works237,207