MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966088908 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-40679

Application of Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in Aerodynamics Prediction of Low-Reynolds-Number Flapping Motion

2010· article· en· W1966088908 on OpenAlexaff
M. R. Amiralaei, Maral Partovibakhsh, Hekmat Alighanbari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemAirfoilLift (data mining)AerodynamicsFlappingReynolds numberComputational fluid dynamicsComputer scienceFuzzy inference systemLift-to-drag ratioControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicAerospace engineeringMechanicsFuzzy control systemArtificial intelligencePhysicsEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the present study is to develop an Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model to predict the unsteady lift coefficients of an airfoil. The airfoil performs a flapping motion in Low-Reynolds-Number (LRN) flow regime. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of the flow field are conducted and the corresponding unsteady lift coefficients are used as the input data to ANFIS. The results show that the ANFIS model is capable of predicting the lift coefficients with very good accuracy, which could be of great value in the preliminary design stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFrench-language works237,207