MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966093076 · doi:10.1097/blo.0b013e3180307c0a

Increased Expression of Chitinase 3-like Protein 1 Secondary to Joint Immobility

2006· article· en· W1966093076 on OpenAlexaff
Guy Trudel, Anneliese D. Recklies, Odette Laneuville

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicStudies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
Canadian institutionsShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartilageMedicineOsteoarthritisGene expressionKnee JointDegeneration (medical)Articular cartilageCell biologyGeneAnatomyPathologyBiologySurgeryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have established mechanical stimulation of joints is necessary to maintain the structure and function of the articular cartilage. Immobilization of the rat knee joint induces cartilage degeneration and reduces the joint range of motion, two of the clinical parameters used to define a joint contracture. We hypothesized chondrocytes from articular cartilage increase their expression of the chitinase 3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) gene in response to joint immobility. We selected the CHI3L1 gene on the basis of its identification as a differentially expressed gene in the articular cartilage obtained from immobilized rat knee joints. Expression of CHI3L1 mRNA was increased after 2 and 4 weeks of immobility. A time-course study revealed that CHI3L1 immuno-reactivity was increased at 2 and 4 weeks and return to basal levels at all later time points. CHI3L1 gene adds to the list of differentially expressed genes defining the response of cartilage to joint immobility. Our data confirm a protective role for CHI3L1 in the initial phase of degeneration induced by immobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchSame topicStudies on Chitinases and ChitosanasesFrench-language works237,207